Skip to main content

Built ‘Not’ to Last – a Product in Constant Innovation


This was posted originally in the Millennial Media tech blog.


The longer products are used before end-of-life, the higher the return on investment. Therefore, we plan our products to be robust enough to withstand market changes and technology evolution. However, in the ever-evolving area of campaign optimization at Millennial Media we build features to be used, learned from, and replaced quickly. Therefore, when we replace a feature, it’s more likely to be because of the feature’s success than due to an inadequacy. Quick end-of-life means that the feature was widely adopted and that we gained meaningful insights from its use, enough to justify investing in the next feature iteration. Paraphrasing Porras’ and Collin’s famous business book, we “build not to last”.
Here’s a typical example of how it may occur: Our data-science team comes up with an algorithm to partially automate a certain optimization process. Next, we build an interface to easily initiate, monitor and control the settings of that algorithm within each campaign. Our optimizers and account managers try it out, measure results and over time develop best practices. Once we have firm best practices we incorporate them into the algorithm. The partially automated algorithm becomes fully automated and the interface built to control it is rendered useless and removed. As soon as things “stabilize”, we start working on the next innovation that will construct and destruct once again.
While our features are in constant flux, the platform as a whole is intended to last longer. In fact, it’s the platform’s service-oriented architecture, in which independent components connect through APIs that gives us flexibility to iterate quickly. This is because services are de-coupled from each other and we can replace a given service without changing its connected services.
So the next time you hear that we killed an optimization feature, come congratulate the engineering, account management, and product teams involved for a job well done.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SDM from up on the bridge

I am taking the first spring semester as a long distance student in MIT's System Design and Managment (SDM) program. The long distance option, which I am grateful for, poses some challenges. A month into the semester, I am still trying to improve the interaction with the classroom, faculty and fellow students and maintain a balance between school and work. Setting up a work station I am using my home office (/living room /dining room/ guest sofa) from which I connect to the ‘bridge’. I find it useful to work with two screens. One displays the class, the mike controls and my video (I want to see how I appear to people looking at me from the classroom). The other displays the presentation slides and notebook (OneNote). The webcam is positioned above the main screen and when I look at the other screen, I am not facing the webcam. Class participation The video and sound quality are good. Material is always available before hand on the web. So keeping up with the studies is eas...

Frugal Innovation in Healthcare

I have been working on EVOCAM a low cost endoscopy system with my partners at Evolving Technologies. Using frugal innovation techniques we developed a light, portable endoscopy prototype for a fraction of the price of existing solutions. Recently Medicine for Humanity physicians used our system to operate in Uganda. To allow training to continue from afar, after volunteer physicians returned home, we are planning to add a tele-medical feature to our device. I joined the team after they already had a working prototype and focused on market research, creating a concise massage and preparing a parametric engineering evaluation that exemplifies how EVOTECH is positioned in the market place. Basically everything it takes to turn a good idea into a good business plan. I am currently working rendering another EVOCAM out of MIT’s hobby machine shop. Together we took EVOTECH into MIT’s $100K business plan semi-finals (still competing) and to a bunch of other competitions in MIT and out...

10 Recommended Readings on Business and Policy

Piles of business and policy books are published every year. While almost any book has something worthwhile in it, only a small fraction are good. And for every profound idea there is a load of simplifications, unbiased assertions, after the fact reasoning and hype. When considering what to read I know what to avoid. For starters, I’d avoid anything with a title similar to this blog title – anything with a number in it: “365 days of success”, “8 new roles of money” (from the Kiyosaki who brought us rich dad poor dad) or “101 ways to turn your business around”. I also avoid biographies and autobiographies. They tend to present a simplified view where the fortunes of companies and nations are over attributed to one person. This view is misleading and even dangerous when people start believing in saviors and messiahs . Autobiographies have all the flaws of biographies and they are also biased and are too often just pure narcissism. Finally, I won’t read a book about a company written f...