Until reading James Rickards' FT article (need to be a registered FT user to view) about the financial crises in Greece I had a feeling there is something fundamentally wrong with CDS trade, but I didn't understand exactly what.
While all the above-mentioned reasons are true Rickards introduces a simpler flaw with CDS. A regular insurance has a insurable interest. An insurance company giving a person life insurance has an interest in keeping the person alive since that way they will not have to pay the insurance. CDS traders, on the other hand, have an interest to exacerbate any crises since they are not liable for the insurance. As mediator between the two sides of the swap, they earn their income on margins on transactions and the more transactions (like in a volatile situation) the better.
Comments
Post a Comment